Fair enough. However they still have their tent-based GA line in Fremont (based on recent drone footage). Company culture at that scale doesn't change fast.
For what it is worth, here is my take as a former automotive manufacturing (and controls systems) engineer...
The issue that I care most about is safety and automotive manufacturers have an ethical (and, arguably, legal) obligation to have a solid, well-maintained and well-documented manufacturing process. It takes only a
slight oversight and surprisingly little carelessness to unknowingly send out tens or hundreds of thousands of cars to consumers that have severe safety defects that can kill or injure.
From published reports regarding Tesla's Fremont operations (some being quite recent), the working conditions seem, well, less-than-ideal still which goes directly to the safety of the vehicles. Human error is definitely a byproduct of substandard working conditions. To the best of my knowledge, the GA "tents" are not even climate controlled which is a significant issue on the surface.
Tesla also has a CEO in Musk that is perfectly fine with shipping "beta" safety-critical control software to consumers - which is
never acceptable. It says quite a bit about their internal practices.
Given this evidence, I am deeply concerned about the safety of Tesla owners today (including a few of my colleagues who are Tesla owners) and the roadway/non-roadway participants coming into contact with these vehicles. I hope that I am wrong because I do not want to see anyone hurt, but where there is smoke, there is fire in this industry.
I am not trying to influence anyone's car buying decisions, but it is my ethical obligation to the public as an engineer to point out these issues.
Sincerely,
Adam J. Cook