or they use KMH internally and round the cruisecontrol upto the nearest KM, and the display down to the nearest KMVW mis-programmed the software that drives cruise control. They used < instead of ≤.
(Don't know if this is really true.)
I get this too. Recently I noticed it happened when the speed limit just increased. I was going more than 5mph faster than the old speed limit, but still under the new limit. I'm guessing programming error, alerting based on the old limit but somehow displaying the new limit also. Hopefully an easy ota fix.Or something could just be very wrong in general given I got this the other day. ¯\(ツ)/¯
View attachment 4414
It's often driving at 1kmh lower than ACC set speed as well, so probably not a rounding mistmatch.or they use KMH internally and round the cruisecontrol upto the nearest KM, and the display down to the nearest KM
Am I seeing that right? The display nags you about exceeding the speed limit? Based on what?
only if you have that setting turned on will it tell you that. it is optional and based on both GPS and camera speed limit dataAm I seeing that right? The display nags you about exceeding the speed limit? Based on what?
The camera does read the road signs and pretty well I have found. There have been several constructions zones go up on my way to work that have temporary speed limit signs posted and not all totally uniform, and the camera picks them up no problem. Usually just a handful of feet beyond the sign it will display the speed limit.Thanks. I retired from the traffic data industry and was on development teams for interactive mapping and roadside-to-vehicle data communications. The data sets not that long ago were simply not there to do this accurately for most of the country. So the... or a... camera is reading roadside signage? The GPS data alone is woefully inaccurate and never fully current; a timely update infrastructure doesn't exist.
Then there's the tin-foil hat side of this, the "optional" thing. You'd actually voluntarily enable your car to record when and where you're violating the law, albeit a minor one? What happens when it's no longer optional? We had long and intense conference room debates about this aspect of our car data recording, and resolved nothing. Knowing what's in the sausage I find this particular "feature" a bit frightening.
Thank you, John! And I completely forgot about EDRs, and that's after evaluating EDR metadata docs in my project suite! Retirement does that, ya' know.... also why I will never have one of those insurance company OBD plug-ins to record how "safe" of a driver you are.
Waze is unique in that has an army of volunteer map editors that help keep data up to date on the maps including speed limits. I have personally "fixed" all the speed limit issues on my typical drives. Updates to the maps are rolled out to the fleet within 2-3 days. Other mapping systems are way out of date in comparison.The data sets not that long ago were simply not there to do this accurately for most of the country. So the... or a... camera is reading roadside signage? The GPS data alone is woefully inaccurate and never fully current; a timely update infrastructure doesn't exist.
No system is going to perfect everywhere all the time.Waze is good conceptually in the same way AirBNB, Uber, Lyft and Bird are, but they only function where the people are, i.e., in metro density. When your life is mostly deep rural or even moderately-sized (15K) rural towns in "flyover" country, these otherwise great ideas fall completely apart. Where we live there are no AirBNB opportunities in a 60 mile radius and there is no Uber or Lyft here nor any traditional taxi service - data-driven stuff most of you take for granted now. DoorDash has one driver in our town, which was a real problem during the pandemic peak. And like I said elsewhere here, the closest VW dealer is an hour away.
IOW, I doubt the army of Waze volunteers are plying the backroads of rural America, on roads where you might see half a dozen vehicles a day, where the "official" speed limit might change through a village of 200 and is otherwise not posted. There's a whole lot of fixed, paved infrastructure that even escapes things like cell coverage - we had to change providers recently because Verizon or partner local cellcos were totally unavailable on one of our frequent 300-mile drives.
Heck... I was a principal engineer on one traffic data project that used anonymized cell pings to survey traffic speeds. The project was shut down the week of the press release due to public outcry, as somebody else figured out on very-low-traffic roads it was pretty easy to triangulate on individual identities by their movements and locations alone.
Community and other hive-oriented data collection concepts are nice until you get past the exurbs or off the Interstates. Then you're simply just lost.