Volkswagen ID Forum banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered User
Joined
·
371 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Tire Car Wheel Vehicle Land vehicle


For anyone that isn't familiar with the Scout name and where it came from, Autoblog has a good article explaining the history of it.


The original Scout
Let's dispel a myth before it's cemented into a fact on social media: Scout has never been a brand. It was a nameplate, much like Golf or Mustang, and the brand that marketed it was International-Harvester. While the firm was better known for building farming equipment, it made a dizzying selection of products including freezers, lawn mowers, vans and trucks. Its pickups were never as popular as the Big Three's, but they earned a reputation for being tough and innovative; International-Harvester notably gets credit for making the first four-door crew-cab pickup, which it named Travelette and launched in 1957. It's with this experience that the firm jumped into the SUV segment.

Released for 1961, the original Scout was a forward-thinking off-roader that was arguably the Jeep CJ's first direct rival. Sure, the Toyota Land Cruiser disembarked on our shores in 1958 but only one example was sold that year and it remained a relatively obscure truck by the time the Scout began arriving in showrooms. Like the CJ, the Scout was envisioned as a simple, go-anywhere trucklet that could be put to work on a farm or taken on a long Memorial Day fishing trip. International-Harvester offered the first-generation model (called "80" internally) with several removable top options including a vinyl Cab Top, a steel Cab Top and a steel Travel Top. The first two made the Scout a pickup, while the latter turned it into a wagon. Regardless, the Scout came standard with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine (which was essentially a V8 cut in half) rated at 93 horsepower and 135 pound-feet of torque. Rear-wheel drive came standard, and four-wheel drive was optional.

With excellent off-road capacity, a practical design, and a friendly face, the Scout quickly won over buyers. Pricing in 1961 started at $1,771 for rear-wheel drive and $2,139 for four-wheel drive, figures that would today represent around $17,200 and $20,700, respectively. In comparison, that year Jeep shoppers could drive home in a CJ-3B for $1,890 or in a CJ-5 for $1,980 (about $18,300 and $19,200, respectively). Both came standard with four-wheel drive, but their 2.2-liter Hurricane four-cylinder engine was rated at 70 horsepower and 114 pound-feet of torque.

International-Harvester made numerous updates to the Scout during the 1960s to keep it competitive. Roll-down windows became available as an option in 1962, while 1965 brought an improved model called 800 internally (shown above) and characterized by a new-look front end and a longer list of standard features, among other changes. Buyers who wanted more power got their wish granted in 1966, when the list of options grew with the addition of a V8 and, believe it or not, a turbocharged (!) 2.2-liter Comanche four-cylinder rated at 111 horsepower.

These updates carried the original Scout and its derivatives through the 1971 model year, but a lot had changed in the automotive landscape since its unveiling. SUVs were no longer an eccentric niche for farmers and hunters. Jeep CJ sales remained strong, the Toyota Land Cruiser had established a secure foothold in the United States, and the Ford Bronco and the Chevrolet Blazer were stealing the spotlight.

The Scout II
Released as a 1971 model, and briefly sold alongside its predecessor, the second-generation Scout was aptly named Scout II. It shared little more than a name with the original model: it was larger, less rudimentary, and available with bigger V8 engines. Shown above, it's this version of the Scout that the sketch released by Volkswagen in May 2022 seemingly alludes to; the kink in the beltline is unmistakable.

At launch, the Scout II came standard with a 3.2-liter four-cylinder engine rated at 93 horsepower and 143 pound-feet of torque and rear-wheel drive. Buyers could order a V8 (or a straight-six) and four-wheel-drive (with manual or automatic locking front hubs) at an extra cost.

While the born-again Scout will have four doors, the Scout II was only available as a two-door. Drivers who wanted a four-door International-Harvester were shown the huge Travelall, which competed directly against the Chevrolet Suburban. Several Scout II off-shoots were made during the 1970s, however. 1976 brought the Scout II Terra, a pickup released largely to fill the gap left by the firm's more work-oriented trucks that were axed after 1975, and the Scout II Traveler, a roomier model that partially filled in for the Travelall. Across the pond, Swiss firm Monteverdi even turned the Scout II into a stunningly luxurious SUV called Safari, though that's a different story for a different time.

New variants and option packages kept buyers interested in the Scout but all was not well under the surface, and several factors contributed to its demise. One is that demand for SUVs dipped in the late 1970s. If you were, say, Oldsmobile, that's fine; you could crank up Cutlass production. International-Harvester didn't have this option because the Scout II was its only entry into America's passenger-car segment. Another is that a United Auto Workers strike that lasted from November 1979 to April 1980 cost International-Harvester a tremendous amount of money. In spite of these setbacks, the company made a final round of updates to the Scout II for 1980. The two-wheel-drive variant was retired, rectangular headlights appeared, rust-proofing improved, and a Nissan-sourced turbodiesel engine was made optional.

Scout II sales ended after the 1980 model year, and International-Harvester left the light-duty truck segment to allocate all of its attention to its heavy-duty models. It was short on money but not short on ideas: it tentatively planned to release a Scout III for the 1982 model year, it experimented with fiberglass bodies, and it even evaluated expanding its range with a buggy and a minivan, among other body styles.
 

·
Registered User
Enthusiastic 1st Edition Owner
Joined
·
3,513 Posts
I think this can go a couple of different ways, like "What was the Bronco," or "What was the Thunderbird," or even "What was the Beetle or Bus"

There will be debate, there will be outright dismissal. The only certainty is it will be nothing like the original except for a few visual cues and a badge.

I can see VW beating Toyota to replace the import pickup and 4Runner with electric options, if they play this right.
 

·
Registered User
Joined
·
599 Posts
I was riding in a friend's old mid-late 60s 4WD Scout negotiating a turn. Some fool lost his wheel with the inner axle attached. It went rolling ahead and off towards the curb. That fool was us. We realized it when the crunching started. IIRC, it was a broken wheel bearing. A little fluffing and fixing and he drove it for a few more years.
 

·
Registered User
Joined
·
843 Posts
I remember people would point to them and say they were the best off-roader. Maybe because of the big engine, of which didn’t people say their straight 6 was the best engine for it’s time?
 

·
Registered User
Joined
·
361 Posts
I think this can go a couple of different ways, like "What was the Bronco," or "What was the Thunderbird," or even "What was the Beetle or Bus"

There will be debate, there will be outright dismissal. The only certainty is it will be nothing like the original except for a few visual cues and a badge.

I can see VW beating Toyota to replace the import pickup and 4Runner with electric options, if they play this right.
I also believe the new Scout will be very different ( visually) from the original. In fact, I don't think it will look much like the concept sketches either. It will be modern vehicle with some off-road capabilities and as you said, with some styling reminders of the old one. Retro designs can only take you so far. The new Beetle is now gone, although it bring a lot off attention to the brand. The T-Bird is gone as well as the Prowler and HHR. It seems only the Mustang is doing well. I am not sure how the Mini is doing or the Fiat 500. BMW is probably selling more Mini-based BMWs that Minis. I also believe that Stellantis is selling more Fiat based Jeeps than Fiats in the US.
 

·
Registered User
Joined
·
925 Posts
Actually, I don't think the motor was all that big looking back at the old Jeep truck I drove when I was a teenager. It was an inline 6 that made over 200hp. People I think liked the Scout because, like a Jeep, it was light, had a 'big enough' motor, and the right gearing to crawl, climb, scrape, and scrap over just about anything in it's way.

People didn't talk about HP much in those days, they talked about gear ratios. :) LOL And most of them used a Dana transmission and 4x4 drive train that was highly modable.

I remember people would point to them and say they were the best off-roader. Maybe because of the big engine, of which didn’t people say their straight 6 was the best engine for it’s time?
 

·
Registered User
1st Edition
Joined
·
412 Posts
My scoutmaster bought a new Travelall in the late 60’s. Assembly quality was appallingly bad, you could see through the door / body junctions. Reliability was about the same.

Years later, I checked out a Scout. I was about eight inches too tall to sit in it.
 

·
Registered User
Joined
·
345 Posts
My uncle had an early IH Scout and complained that the front and rear track distances were enough different to be irritating on snow and mud. He sold it and bought a Jeep Wagoneer which was possibly the worst vehicle ever manufactured.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Nai3t

·
Registered User
Joined
·
4 Posts
Interesting to see how the new 4 door Scout will resonate with older customers that are familiar with the brand and probably expect a 2 door Scout. What features are you expecting from this "new" vehicle? I think a removable hard top would be fantastic.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top