500 miles and 1000 kWh charging capabilities.
500 miles and 1000 kWh charging capabilities.It's not for me because I tow large trailers over long distances but it will sell.
View attachment 20077
The only choice now is pay expensive diesel or pay the rail barons monopoly.I read a couple weeks ago about Pepsi taking delivery, and they mentioned they would use it for hauling Frito Lay (chips, light load) over long distances and Pepsi (Heavy Load) over short distances. So yeah, there's something there to dig into. I think the electric Semi idea will work for some loads, but I'm not convinced it will work for all loads yet. Of course, electrify those routes that WILL work and THEN see if an answer pops out for the rest.
When fuel ⛽ prices goes back up after elections that will change your mind.Don't get me wrong, I think the Cybertruck will sell. It's just not for me.
Ford EV truck has a pathetic low towing rate and Chevy is also inefficient which you may as well go diesel. Dodge Stellantis is too late in the game and will come in 2025.But why the Cybertruck in particular? Why not a Ford F-150 Lightning? Or a Chevy electric Silverado? Or the now-impending Dodge electric RAM that may or may not come with an ICE range extender?
People here are complaining that the Hyundai Ioniq 5 has weird styling and they'd never buy it for that reason but compared to the Cybertruck, the Ioniq 5 is completely mainstream. The Cybertruck? THAT is some seriously weird, affected styling that is only likely to appeal to a very particular set of tastes. (People who missed out on buying a Delorean?)
But physics is physics so if the Ford truck's range sucks when it's towing some arbitrary trailer, then the Cybertruck's range will suck similarly when it's towing the same arbitrary trailer; it's not like Ford is foolishly pulling the trailer wrong. Starting with more range will help, but the proportionality must still hold.