Volkswagen ID Forum banner
41 - 57 of 57 Posts
Now that the awd pro s plus I reserved almost a year ago has lost its 360 overhead, should I look at the Ford? When Will it come ?
The Mach E is out now and has been for a couple years. If you are thinking of the new MEB based Ford Explorer EV, that one won't be sold in the US. If you are looking to future models you probably want to add the Chevy Equinox EV to your compare / contrast list. I assume you are cross-shopping similarly sized vehicles that qualify for the Federal Tax Credit which would include the Tesla Model Y.

Which features are most important to you? If area view and / or automatic folding mirrors are a high priority then you need to look at the Mach E. If you really want heated rear seats and three zone climate control then you need to stick with the Pro S Plus. VW is certainly making it more difficult to argue for the ID.4 by removing the features from their top trim level.
 
Discussion starter · #42 ·
IMO anyone shopping the higher trims of the ID4 should cross-shop the Mustang Mach-E and probably also the Model Y (and Kia EV and Hyundai Ioniq 5).

I suspect the MEB-based Explorer EV will be better than the ID4. Ford's electronics and infotainment are light-years ahead of VW's: PaaK (phone as key), rock-solid and instant mobile app (remote "start", etc), faster responding screen, etc.
 
The Mach E is out now and has been for a couple years. If you are thinking of the new MEB based Ford Explorer EV, that one won't be sold in the US. If you are looking to future models you probably want to add the Chevy Equinox EV to your compare / contrast list. I assume you are cross-shopping similarly sized vehicles that qualify for the Federal Tax Credit which would include the Tesla Model Y.

Which features are most important to you? If area view and / or automatic folding mirrors are a high priority then you need to look at the Mach E. If you really want heated rear seats and three zone climate control then you need to stick with the Pro S Plus. VW is certainly making it more difficult to argue for t he ID.4 by removing the features from their top trim level.
I was happy with the AWD pro s plus, but the features I wanted were the overhead view and the power mirrors. I don't care about heat or climate control in the back seats. Now that the plus will have neither of the features I want, I will either drop back to a awd pro S or look for an alternative. The two most immediate options seem to be the Mach E and the Subaru Solterra. But the Mach E looks to be expensive, especially because the least expensive trim on which they are accepting orders appears to be the California with the bigger battery. And of course the Subaru is not eligible for the rebate. For me the Ioniq 5 is not an option because the closest dealer is two hours away.

I have waited almost a year for the id4 and do not want to wait another year for a Ford or Subaru.
 
Discussion starter · #44 ·
Can you drop down to the AWD Pro S and keep your place in line or do you have to start over? Our MME was similar in price to our 21 AWD Pro S (which has folding mirrors but no 360 parking cam) and we got the credit for both, but a lot of things have changed since then. The MME has folding mirrors and 360 parking cam. The main thing offhand the MME lacks is no sunshade on the pano roof, although I haven't used once used the ID4's.

I was happy with the AWD pro s plus, but the features I wanted were the overhead view and the power mirrors. I don't care about heat or climate control in the back seats. Now that the plus will have neither of the features I want, I will either drop back to a awd pro S or look for an alternative. The two most immediate options seem to be the Mach E and the Subaru Solterra. But the Mach E looks to be expensive, especially because the least expensive trim on which they are accepting orders appears to be the California with the bigger battery. And of course the Subaru is not eligible for the rebate. For me the Ioniq 5 is not an option because the closest dealer is two hours away.

I have waited almost a year for the id4 and do not want to wait another year for a Ford or Subaru.
 
Slightly off topic perhaps, but what about delivery times? It looks like from the Ford website if you order today you may wait 4-6 months. However, VW has not provided any target delivery timeframe that I'm aware of for MY '23.
Fyi, I just noticed today that the local VW dealer where I bought my ID.4 in mid December (Ken Ganley VW Bedford OH), is now advertising for the first time that they have 16 ID.4s in stock or coming in. Never mentioned ID.4 in their ads before. So it appears factory has ramped up production. And/or this is the impact of no longer doing online reservations.
 
Discussion starter · #46 ·
Plus the crazy market cooling and demand trailing off. Tesla's price drops and tax credit status have to be hurting a lot of other EV makers.

Fyi, I just noticed today that the local VW dealer where I bought my ID.4 in mid December (Ken Ganley VW Bedford OH), is now advertising for the first time that they have 16 ID.4s in stock or coming in. Never mentioned ID.4 in their ads before. So it appears factory has ramped up production. And/or this is the impact of no longer doing online reservations.
 
One-Pedal Driving: Ford, hands down. It has true OPD and enough brake regen to comfortably and normally come to a complete stop in most driving conditions. This didn’t seem like a huge feature going in, but after having both, it became clear quickly that true OPD is a huge positive. One of two of the biggest surprises.
OPD vs NOPD
  • No SIN's vs SIN's 1st law
  • No driver engagement vs Driver engagement
  • Inoperative vs Operative brakes
  • Failing and rusty vs Working and non-rusty brake components
 
OPD vs NOPD
  • No SIN's vs SIN's 1st law
  • No driver engagement vs Driver engagement
  • Inoperative vs Operative brakes
  • Failing and rusty vs Working and non-rusty brake components
is there enough data to support claim that brakes rust and fail?
As of drivers engagement - let’s then go back to manual gear maybe?
It is same level of effort - release gradually acceleration to completely stop or release acceleration and then use brakes - imho former is more convenient and engaging, the latter is distracting.
 
We test drove the Mach E and had a few big issues…
  • Lack of storage spacewith the sloped roof, like the Model Y, it won’t hold a large dog crate or other large box
  • Lack of roof rails / trailer hitch, so no place to put the bike rack
  • Acceleration was to abrupt (Premium LR AWD) - the VW may be a little slower but it’s much smoother on and off
I liked the looks of the Mach E, but also like the looks of the ID.4 - they’re just different design philosophy. I liked the efficiency of the ID.4 better (Mach E needed much bigger battery to get similar range in real world testing), but liked the interior trim and infotainment better in the Mach E.

But the overriding factor was price! The long range Mach E was so expensive even back in 2021, that it wasn’t seriously considered for long.
 
VW ID.4 Pro S AWD vs Ford Mustang Mach E AWD SR (eqpt group 300A)

Owned both vehicles in the title for a while now and thought I'd do a quick comparo. Hope this might help someone deciding between.
You have not mentioned what model years or trim levels you purchased. With the rate of change this makes a HUGE difference. I drove an E-Mustang that was sold by it's owner and it was a very nice feeling vehicle, better than the Teslas (3 and Y) and more comfortable. I did not ask the previous owner if he was returning it for the door opening problem or not. I did not like it's lane keeping or one pedal throttle function. I also did not like how LOW the Ford was or how little cargo space it has. I prefer the better visibility of the VW which is by far better.

To be fair, the E-Mustang is a sedan while the ID.4 is an SUV.
... heavy weight known after that initial turn in if you try to hold speed through or accelerate out of a corner.
The turns around here are so high I can get penalized by my drive monitoring program that rewards good driving. However I have felt no problem with holding speeds or accelerating out of corners. On initial test drives of 2021 and 2022 models the single motor versions seemed to have a ponderous feeling to them where the dual motor models did not. On my 23 I don't detect any ponderous feel. One issue is that the ruts and breaks on I-81 cause a bouncy effect. And Lane Assist has at times messed up.
...
One-Pedal Driving: Ford, hands down. It has true OPD and enough brake regen to comfortably and normally come to a complete stop in most driving conditions. This didn’t seem like a huge feature going in, but after having both, it became clear quickly that true OPD is a huge positive. One of two of the biggest surprises.
One pedal driving the way some makers use it is DANGEROUS. Some of the car review magazines note that using OPD to slow down can cause a rapid deceleration all the while NOT lighting the brake light. Two makers were given a do not buy recommendation because of it. The B mode on the ID.4, I believe, if activated gently will not light the brakes lights either. But at some g force (I forget what that is) it will light the brake lights. I consider this a hard stop if the brakes do not behave like the ID.4s do. ALSO: using Adaptive Cruise Control may not activate the brake lights. Some (unhinged, stupid, crazy fools) who tailgate may think this is brake checking and act poorly. ACC will recharge on slowing and will also come to a complete stop and resume if the stop is not to great. There are sections near me where this is a great help.
Driver Aids: Close. I find the LKA on the ID.4 overly sensitive and its corrections too harsh. The sensor can be fooled fairly easily, and it’s no fun to have an unexpected tug on the wheel in heavy rain or with snow/ice on the ground. It can also be a real issue on narrow lined roads: if there’s an oncoming large vehicle, I want to be able to casually drift my passenger side tires onto or even slightly over the edge line without having the car forcefully jerk me back (into the oncoming vehicle).
Sounds to me like your Lane Keeping Assist is different from mine. As stated in the Manual, you can gently cause the car to move against the lane assist if you want to. I do this regularly. I would NOT say that the ID.4 ever forcefully resists my repositioning.
The Ford’s seems less intrusive and safer. I don’t find myself regularly using the VW’s travel assist feature, and haven’t had the Ford on a longish drive on a highway that supports full Blue Cruise. Both’s adaptive cruise works well.
I found both Tesla and the Mustang's lane assist to be annoying and a pain. Tesla's one pedal regeneration is so harsh at the minimum level I see why a NO BUY recommendation has been made.
Headlights: edge to VW. Both vehicles have very good low beam headlights but the VW with the foul weather (turning/side) lights is excellent for driving in neighborhoods, around parked cars, and in general where you are concerned about cross people/bikes/etc.
...The VW has an amazingly tight turning radius while the MME is just fine/normal. But the MME parking sensors are quicker to turn on and react, and it has the 360-degree camera view.
It is often remarked on my reviewers and owners that the VW has a tighter turning circle.
Electronics: Hands down the MME. The Ford has PAK (phone as key) that works flawlessly with multiple phones/drivers.
The ID unlocks on approach if you have a key on you, and it is ON when you sit down.
Approach the MME with a paired phone and it’s just like you have a key fob in your pocket. And, you can just walk away and have the car automatically lock.
Functionally this is no change.
This was a surprise feature and even more of a surprise how convenient it is – the other of the two biggest surprises.[I've had auto unlock for years on several VW models.
Connecting, setting up, and switching devices is well….modern like and iPhone or iPad whereas the VW is a mess.
I had no issues with linking my cell phone.?QUOTE] The Ford has real buttons on the steering wheel for adjusting volume, changing track, etc. I hate the capacitive buttons all over the VW and haven’t gotten used to them in almost a year.
Took me a few days to readjust to the steering wheel controls. They could be better though.
The main center computer has had no bugs or issues while the VW’s has.
Mine does not and has not had any of the flaws that I've seen in other VW models, (this could change).
The Ford B&O stereo is superior in terms of solid, tight bass and clarity at higher volumes.
I cannot comment on this since I NEVER use the radio.
Both have wireless CarPlay which is how we use the system. While the Ford’s screen is bigger, I prefer the horizontal orientation and slight cant toward the driver of the VW.

Updates: Ford. We’ve had the VW almost a year and not gotten a single update or improvement to the software. In a month with the Ford we’ve already gotten one or two.
The 23 model has had a minor update since I got mine in that it no longer looks for the 2G or 3G networks to communicate. Took VW a while to fix that. Now it won't look any slower than 4K.
Mobile App: Hands down the MME. The VW app is slow and unreliable and has fewer features. The “upgrade” to the iOS app around 6 months ago was anything but – it now often requires manually re-inputting username/password and almost always requires re-entering a PIN. The MME app works flawlessly with FaceID. The Ford app also has better notifications – eg, when the vehicle is fully charged.
Mine is flawless. A problem that did occur is that the Itunes/IOS upgrade caused my Iphone to "go to sleep" and not answer calls with no warning. I had to have a new E-sim installed.
Charging: MME. The VW has weirdness with the charge rate between 9.6kW and 4.8kW while the Ford doesn’t allow setting a universal max charge amount.
Ford got into a LOT OF TROUBLE for putting an unchangeable max limit on recharging, as well as for the doors failing to open. Both should be resolved now.
That said, the Ford mobile app allows easily overriding a given location’s max charge to 100% instead.
Ford is the only maker I know of that hard coded an 80% max limit.
Both charge easily overnight on a L2 EVSE delivering 40A (ie, 50a circuit).
Mine charges at 48 Amps and over 40 miles per hour on my Emporia EVSE.
The tipping point is the charge port location of the Ford is superior (front driver fender versus rear passenger quarter panel).
I see no preference one way or another.
Range: Tie (see details). The VW has more range versus the standard range (ie, smaller battery option) Ford. However, we find ourselves renting an ICE vehicle for long road trips, so the VW’s extra range and EA network and free supercharging aren’t a factor for us.
The FREE THREE year EA charging is a huge factor if a person can spend ZERO on driving. There are enough 350KW chargers that any stopping time is minimal. Unless you are time constrained, I find you decision to rent an ICE for trips to be strange. And I also don't like rental cars since it takes time to truly know a vehicles feel and to drive it to it's best performance and safety levels.

While you experiences are radically different from mine, this could be due to different production years and/or trim levels.
 
is there enough data to support claim that brakes rust and fail?
As of drivers engagement - let’s then go back to manual gear maybe?
It is same level of effort - release gradually acceleration to completely stop or release acceleration and then use brakes - imho former is more convenient and engaging, the latter is distracting.
A1. That's FMTKFYTFO - ForMeToKnowForYouToFindOut.

A2. It is more engaging to drive a manual gearbox than the lazy slushbox, except for a DSG.

A3. 1) VAG SOPD or NOPD doesn't bring the vehicle to a complete stop; instead, it creeps. This follows SIN's Law and helps to maintain the car's momentum, thereby saving energy. It requires more energy to move a car weighing nearly 6000 lbs from a standstill, but once the car is in motion, less energy is needed to keep it going.

2) Floor it and use the LFBT - LeftFootBrakingTechnique is very engaging.
 
I had put in a deposit on an ID.4 but abandoned it due to a number of reasons. I opted instead to get a Mach-E GT. After almost a year we have been very happy with our decision. Since I never got a chance to drive an ID.4 I can't truly say whether I would have liked it.

Main reasons for not getting the ID.4
  1. Problems with local dealer - they wouldn't agree to sell it at MSRP or lower. additional red flags in talking with them
  2. Issues with the capacitance controls.
  3. People's complaints about accessing controls at night.
  4. Unsatisfactory communication on when cars would be available.
The Ford dealer was much better to deal with. They not only didn't stick ADM on the price they allowed me my X-Plan pricing. They are also closer to my house.
 
Ground Clearance: I haven't read every single post here, but I don't think that anyone mentioned ground clearance. VW official is 6.8", but that is a very conservative measure only at the wheel linkage, which would clear objects with the wheels. (ID.4 AWD has a bit more on the AWD vs RWD.) I got down and measured it and the effective ground clearance on my 2023 Pro S AWD is 8.6" across the whole underside. This is almost 3" more than the MME at 5.8". Someone could measure the MME, but I think that Ford is counting the main body clearance. Motor Trend complained about MME's ground clearance in one of their reviews. While I don't do serious off-roading, extra ground clearance can really help in a lot of minor situations such as steep driveway entrances, crowned dirt roads, parking on uneven ground, snow, etc.
 
Discussion starter · #54 ·
IIRC, the AWD ID4 is quoted to have 1" more ground clearance. The angle between our driveway and the street is fairly steep such that sporty cars will scrape the front air dam/splitter when backing out even at a 45 degree angle and going painfully slow and neither the ID4 nor the MME have any issues going straight in/out at normal speeds. Beyond that, have no experience with ground clearance to relate.

I believe one can notice the extra ride height on the ID4 vs the MME when cornering enthusiastically. But I think the ID4 also has a softer suspension which also contributes to the "delay" feeling when stuffing it into a corner.

Can't remember if it's been mentioned but the ID4 has a tow rating while the MME has zero.

Ground Clearance: I haven't read every single post here, but I don't think that anyone mentioned ground clearance. VW official is 6.8", but that is right at the wheels, which would ride over objects. (ID.4 AWD has a bit more on the AWD vs RWD.) I got down and measured it and the effective ground clearance on my 2023 Pro S AWD is 8.6". This is 3" more than the MME at 5.8". Someone could measure the MME, but I think that Ford does not count it in the more conservative way that VW does. MotorTrend complained about MME's ground clearance in one of their reviews. While I don't do serious off-roading, extra ground clearance can really help in a lot of minor situations.
 
I believe one can notice the extra ride height on the ID4 vs the MME when cornering enthusiastically. But I think the ID4 also has a softer suspension which also contributes to the "delay" feeling when stuffing it into a corner.
I test drove them back to back… ID.4 AWD Pro S handled better than Mach E Premium… probably despite higher ground clearance and more comfortable ride, because it has much wider tires (esp in the rear) and less rebound in the shocks… my wife also vetoed the Mach E because it’s default throttle tip in was too abrupt, as was the regen even in Whisper mode. VW smoothed out the curves a bit more to make it less jerky (unless you put it in Sport mode)… it just felt a more European car to drive… soaked up the bumps, but didn’t rebound after, cornered flat until you reach progressive understeer at the limits. Neither of them are sports cars, honestly…
 
  • Like
Reactions: RobK2023
VW ID.4 Pro S AWD vs Ford Mustang Mach E AWD SR (eqpt group 300A)

Owned both vehicles in the title for a while now and thought I'd do a quick comparo. Hope this might help someone deciding between.

Price: Lots of factors at play here with tax credits, the IRA, etc. Paid sticker for both and the VW was about $3K less. We had a very good experience with both dealers – no games on price or anything else.

Cabin/Etc: Hard to call. The Ford’s pano glass roof is much more tinted, probably because it does not have a manual or powered shade like the VW, and it starts further back. The VW’s cabin in general feels brighter, and more open and expansive. The MME interior overall feels higher-quality and more solidly put together. The MME has more storage areas in the center console area and it has a sunglasses holder up high. I am very tall and have a little more legroom in the VW.

Looks: ID.4. Obviously subjective, and I get zero looks in the VW versus a number in the Ford, but I prefer the exterior look overall of the ID4.

Acceleration: ID.4. I imagine the LR battery AWD MME would be a better match, but the ID4 feels right quick while the MME is no slouch but feels slower.

Ride/Handling: MME, but close. The VW has an unpleasant twitchiness when cruising while the MME feels dead stable and centered. Both cars have decent initial turn in and cornering capability due to the low center of mass, but both also make their heavy weight known after that initial turn in if you try to hold speed through or accelerate out of a corner.

Noise: MME. The MME has noticeably less tire roar/road noise and is overall a bit quieter with wind noise. However, the Ford does have turbulence noise near the upper A pillar that stands out and starts around 60 MPH.

One-Pedal Driving: Ford, hands down. It has true OPD and enough brake regen to comfortably and normally come to a complete stop in most driving conditions. This didn’t seem like a huge feature going in, but after having both, it became clear quickly that true OPD is a huge positive. One of two of the biggest surprises.

Driver Aids: Close. I find the LKA on the ID.4 overly sensitive and its corrections too harsh. The sensor can be fooled fairly easily, and it’s no fun to have an unexpected tug on the wheel in heavy rain or with snow/ice on the ground. It can also be a real issue on narrow lined roads: if there’s an oncoming large vehicle, I want to be able to casually drift my passenger side tires onto or even slightly over the edge line without having the car forcefully jerk me back (into the oncoming vehicle). The Ford’s seems less intrusive and safer. I don’t find myself regularly using the VW’s travel assist feature, and haven’t had the Ford on a longish drive on a highway that supports full Blue Cruise. Both’s adaptive cruise works well.

Headlights: edge to VW. Both vehicles have very good low beam headlights but the VW with the foul weather (turning/side) lights is excellent for driving in neighborhoods, around parked cars, and in general where you are concerned about cross people/bikes/etc.

Foul weather driving: NA, but likely Ford. I drove the VW through last winter and found it atrocious on the OEM Alenzas in even light snow. A modest low-speed turn with no acceleration makes the rear squirrelly. It is great and confidence-inspiring in the rain. We will see how the Ford compares this winter.

Parking: Tie. The VW has an amazingly tight turning radius while the MME is just fine/normal. But the MME parking sensors are quicker to turn on and react, and it has the 360-degree camera view.

Electronics: Hands down the MME. The Ford has PAK (phone as key) that works flawlessly with multiple phones/drivers. Approach the MME with a paired phone and it’s just like you have a key fob in your pocket. And, you can just walk away and have the car automatically lock. This was a surprise feature and even more of a surprise how convenient it is – the other of the two biggest surprises. Connecting, setting up, and switching devices is well….modern like and iPhone or iPad whereas the VW is a mess. The Ford has real buttons on the steering wheel for adjusting volume, changing track, etc. I hate the capacitive buttons all over the VW and haven’t gotten used to them in almost a year. The main center computer has had no bugs or issues while the VW’s has. The Ford B&O stereo is superior in terms of solid, tight bass and clarity at higher volumes. Both have wireless CarPlay which is how we use the system. While the Ford’s screen is bigger, I prefer the horizontal orientation and slight cant toward the driver of the VW.

Updates: Ford. We’ve had the VW almost a year and not gotten a single update or improvement to the software. In a month with the Ford we’ve already gotten one or two.

Mobile App: Hands down the MME. The VW app is slow and unreliable and has fewer features. The “upgrade” to the iOS app around 6 months ago was anything but – it now often requires manually re-inputting username/password and almost always requires re-entering a PIN. The MME app works flawlessly with FaceID. The Ford app also has better notifications – eg, when the vehicle is fully charged.

Charging: MME. The VW has weirdness with the charge rate between 9.6kW and 4.8kW while the Ford doesn’t allow setting a universal max charge amount. That said, the Ford mobile app allows easily overriding a given location’s max charge to 100% instead. Both charge easily overnight on a L2 EVSE delivering 40A (ie, 50a circuit). The tipping point is the charge port location of the Ford is superior (front driver fender versus rear passenger quarter panel).

Range: Tie (see details). The VW has more range versus the standard range (ie, smaller battery option) Ford. However, we find ourselves renting an ICE vehicle for long road trips, so the VW’s extra range and EA network and free supercharging aren’t a factor for us.
What about room in the backseat?
 
Discussion starter · #57 ·
What about room in the backseat?
That's not a major factor for us so hard for me to say definitively. Offhand, I think the MME has a lower roofline than the ID4 and therefore less headroom front and rear. Front and rear, the MME has more "American" seats while the VW has more "European". The former tending to be flatter and less bolstered, and softer foam, presumably to accommodate the higher obesity rate in the US.
 
41 - 57 of 57 Posts